The Apple is rotten to the core

Considering the week that’s in it, I thought a little trip down memory hole lane might be appropriate. We’ve told you plenty, kept you informed.  Yet you’re still on life support.  When asked what you were “going to be” when you grew up, did you respond: “Infantile” and ask for a cookie?

The argument the wolves make is that sheep are stupid. If they don’t take advantage someone else will. That hubris over time is what is exposing them now. The gap between their fakery and reality is now clear, but they keep on digging. The time has come for the wolfpack to be culled.

Watch everything they do over the coming months. File it away. Archive it.  https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1199572311290077185

In September, an obscure Twitter account promoting a fringe belief about an anti-Trump cabal within the government tweeted out a hashtag: #FakeWhistleblower.
It was typical for the anonymous account, which traffics in far-right content and a conspiracy theory known as QAnon, some of whose adherents think that satanic pedophiles control the “deep state.” The Federal Bureau of Investigation recently labeled QAnon a potential domestic terror threat.
Still, that did not stop others, including a Republican congressional candidate, from quickly picking up the hashtag and tweeting it. Within a week, hundreds of QAnon believers and “MAGA” activists had joined in, posting memes and bogus reports to undermine the complaint by a government whistle-blower that President Trump had pressed Ukraine’s leader for dirt on former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son.
Then Mr. Trump tweeted the hashtag himself.” https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/11/02/us/politics/trump-twitter-disinformation.htm

Did you spot the trick. It’s simple. Yahoo runs a fake story. Story is never verified. Shooting happens. NYT reference the story and link back to Yahoo. Story kept on life support to be used later. Rinse, repeat. How easy is that?

 

What does the EFF do?

You know what a honey trap is?

How did Aaron Swartz die?

He made the mistake of trusting the wrong technology.

Did you know his business partner died too, at 36?

Founder of the electronic frontier foundation: Who is John Perry Barlow?

” John Perry Barlow (October 3, 1947 – February 7, 2018) was an American poet and essayist, a cattle rancher, and a cyberlibertarian political activist who had been associated with both the Democratic and Republican parties.

He was also a lyricist for the Grateful Dead and a founding member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Freedom of the Press Foundation.”  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Perry_Barlow

 

What a loose end this man was. How many points of knowledge, he held.

The bands, the drugs, the global network, the internet, he had it all.

Isaac Kappy?

Anthony Bourdain, Kate Spade?

Robin Williams, Whitney, Chris Cornell, Chester Bennington?

Cameron boyce.

Kubrick died, so did Tony Scott. Its odd to get to that age and decide to end it all.

Randy Quaid spoke out. So did Macauley Culkin. So did Corey Feldman.  Nobody listened, they turned a deaf ear.

Clinton bodycount; you ever investigate that?  Benghazi is real. PizzaGate.

Alex Jones once said the C_A is bigger than McDonalds. I think he’s right.

Poppy Bush sold the drugs.

Junior followed up with a sprinkle of “magic.” Epstein is in there. Weintstein, plenty more.  See how that ties to Zucker and network media. Banking crew is involved (money and movies) and back around the drugs, the parties and the showgirls.

When I look at the EFF website, what I see is what it does not say, rather than what it does. who it looks at and who it doesn’t.

The Internet community as a whole objected strongly to the Communications Decency Act, and with EFF’s help, the anti-free speech provisions were struck down by the Supreme Court. But thankfully, CDA 230 remains and in the years since has far outshone the rest of the law.

Section 230 says that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider” (47 U.S.C. § 230). In other words, online intermediaries that host or republish speech are protected against a range of laws that might otherwise be used to hold them legally responsible for what others say and do.”

” CDA 230 also offers its legal shield to bloggers who act as intermediaries by hosting comments on their blogs.”

Is that true?

 

Protection for “Good Samaritan” blocking and screening of offensive material

(1)Treatment of publisher or speaker

No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

So why are they all removing accounts and content?

https://gizmodo.com/james-dolan-co-creator-of-securedrop-dead-at-36-1821921230

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation

https://www.eff.org/work

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Cornell

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chester_Bennington

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1163063728218263552

0 Comments

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

©2019 www.AD360.co   Go@AD360.co

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account