Building 7 – Engineering consent

The official story is that a group of guys, after a few flight lessons, took over five commercial airliners with boxcutters, flew those planes in various directions. One of the planes flew at ground level into the very section of a building where investigators were looking at a 2.3 trillion dollar bookkeeping error (lucky for some). NORAD appeared to take no notice (even better), even though that system was designed to address a soviet missile strike and the Washington corridor is surrounded by air force bases (freaky lucky). Then a couple headed off to attack a couple of buildings with no military value, but intense cultural significance (killing yourself for artistic merit). These buildings in turn collapsed like pancakes (there that strangeness again) into their own footprint (neat) in less than a day (fast, 100 storey buildings)…causing 18 years of non stop war. All of this took place on the day that signifies “emergency” to people in the USA. The whole opera was supposedly directed by a man who was a known US intel asset, who later hid out in a cave (in the 21st century).  What I call fear porn seems to be the official narrative. You could probably pull a million threads out of that ball of string. I always thought a NY beat cop could have solved it in five minutes by questioning Junior, without even using “enhanced interrogation techniques.” Remember when he couldn’t take a piss without cheney being there.

This week was the anniversary of the twin towers bombing. The media was overflowing with admonitions to “never forget.”Some of you may understand the hypnotic value of such a phrase, repeated over and over with the same sparce imagery. It’s a message to keep bleating. It reminds one of the moon stuff (but let’s not get distracted, shall we, people love to shout “conspiracy,” “birther” or “truther”over and over).

 

I’d guide your attention with the attention to one trick…one of the premiere objectives is to use the pubic purse to fund all of these events, to then use public money to drive a pre-conceived agenda and in doing so to destroy Christianity and western civilization by it’s own hand (this is a central conceit). It’s a very pretty death blossom (if that’s your perspective). To bleed a country dry. It’s very simple stuff, Bush and Co. have been working for Satan, not America.

Another point of attention is how “intelligence” agencies set up their own terrorists and events to control outcomes. This is common practice. Honey traps, blackmail, coercion, payoffs, cut outs, traitors, military coups, military subversion and assassination have all been used with this method.

Here is a central conspiracy theory; building 7 (the story goes it fell into it’s own footprint (again)), not from plane strike, but from a massive internal fire.”

The official theory established that the 47-story colossus collapsed on its base after the tragic attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, at 5:20 p.m., when it was affected by the fire coming from the Twin Towers—Buildings 1 and 2 of the World Trade Center. The building was completely destroyed in just seven seconds. (note: 7 seconds, complete destruction)

However, after investing four years in computer simulations, the FAU scientists published a draft report that concludes that the collapse of the third WTC skyscraper on Sept.11, 2001 was not due to any fire, but “the almost simultaneous failure of every column in the building.” https://thebl.com/us-news/fire-did-not-destroy-world-trade-center-building-7-on-sept-11-scientific-study-reveals.html

At the same time as they are saying “never forget” the online personas are as adroitly as possible trying to forget all about building 7. Why? I had someone die, etc., don’t bring up the “bad” memories. Don’t hurt my feelings with your inconvenient facts. When 3000 engineers say something is a bit fishy…

Some time ago, more than 3,000 active and retired architects and engineers called on the U.S. Congress to conduct a new investigation into the three WTC skyscrapers that were destroyed on Sept. 11.

“The new investigation must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7,” they said.https://thebl.com/us-news/fire-did-not-destroy-world-trade-center-building-7-on-sept-11-scientific-study-reveals.html

I know that no matter what I pull up, you’ll say, not an “official source,”meaning one of the raggle taggle mob of official sources.

The same rags that are being tossed into the air by Trumpie on a daily basis. On the one hand you’re obsessed with following your command and control narrative and yet when Trumpie tells you they are pure bullshit fake news outlets, you mock Trumpie (an actual patriot), who was there on the day, is a native new yorker, property development billionaire and quite clued into how buildings are constructed, said, explosives did it, when interviewed at the time. https://www.disclose.tv/trump-was-one-of-the-first-who-said-only-explosives-could-have-brought-the-wtc-down-312592

“Donald Trump: It wasn’t architectural defect. The World Trade Center was always known as a very very strong building. Don’t forget that took a big bomb in the basement (1993). Now, the basement is the most vulnerable place because that’s your foundation and it withstood that and I got to see that area about three or four days after took place because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour because he did the building and I said “I can’t believe it”. The the building was standing solid and half of the columns were blown out. This was an unbelievably powerful building. If you don’t know anything about structure it was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside. The steel, the reason the World Trade Center had such narrow windows is that in between all the windows, you had the steel on the outside, the steel on the outside of the building.”

Which is it? Your loyalty is to another king, isn’t it? you’d willingly concede any deception to stay asleep. You’re so patriotic drapped in your false flag, yet you’re unwilling to investigate? Riddle me ree.

Another deflection is to honor the dead by continuing to follow the official narrative. An official narrative which has laid waste to Syria, Lybia, Iraq, Afghanistan, created a refugee crisis in most European countries, killed millions of people (brown skinned Muslims and their sovereignty don’t matter according to your narrative), vilified one of the world’s great religions of over 600 mln people, created a massive war industry bonus system and sent militarized american youth off on a multi billion dollar worldwide goose chase.

On one hand, you’re not supposed to hurt the feelings of grieving “family” members and on the other hand you’re supposed to forget the “feelings” of the ordinary people in the middle east in countries that didn’t bomb your building (in the official narrative the pilots were a Saudi based terror group).  You don’t question anything? Ever?

 

Muslims = bad. That seems a little simplistic…unless you’re being pushed into this position intentionally, then you’re just a dupe, everybody’s fool.

In all cases the admonition is to stick to the official line. In the first instance because you’ll hurt “feelings.” In the second to propagate a revenge narrative x1000. In both cases, they keep the script firmly on the “burning twins.” The images are always the same, the same loop, the same sequence, the same fragment of time.

What is always tried in these circumstances is to move the conversation into the “conspiracy theory” basket. The mocking, “truther” cat calls and the “you’re either with us or against us” nonsense.  My argument is fairly straightforward, “a group of people did something.”The reasons varied in terms of motive, but the overall purpose was satanic. Pure evil. The tool of lucifer is deception.

There were proximate and strategic objectives and everyone had their own angle. The “intelligence” angle was one big winner in all of it, the “patriot” act (mirror), operation iraqi freedom (mirror) homeland security (mirror). All the other legislation to turn the US (and the world) into a police state. The jewish angle is another obvious win for one “side” over another.  That is not over quite yet, is – real-is will receive a knock on the door one of these days.

Who was head of the C_A? Geroge Tenet “Tenet appealed to the original mission of the agency, which had been to “prevent another Pearl Harbor

Who was Poppy (Heroin) Bush? Former head of C_A. Who was Cheney? Former boss of Halliburton (military contractor). Who was President? Baby bush. Who was head of security in twin towers? Marvin Bush.  When was FBI director appointed?  When did Larry take over the lease?  Connection of Rummy to Cheney? Wolfowitz? Perle?

“Of the twenty-five people who signed PNAC’s founding statement of principles, ten went on to serve in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush, including Dick CheneyDonald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz.[8][9][10][11]“https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century 

One theory is that the towers were built with the satanic sacrifice in mind by the Rs in R plaza. This makes sense on a construction level (nothing is designed to be permanent, especially in a major city). The twin towers were old and their infrastructure was creaking. To take down the buildings in a conventional manner would have involved lots of public consultation, reports and working with the surrounding owners over a protracted period of time. The towers were every well built with an exceptionally strong steel outer-casing augmented by an inner pile (take a look at Japanese anti earth quake technologies for reference points). So the traditional path of demolition was going to be expensive. Why not demolish it anyway and blame …a whatever? Collect the insurance? Rebuild with on the same site after banking a profit.

The twins were taken down on a specific day. A day that ties to a calendar. It was a scripted event. It’s a show of power and a trigger (quite literally, a smoking gun). They even removed the evidence and threw it in a river (figuratively) by shipping all the steel off and melting it down.

You were pre-programmed for years by Hollywood and MSM for this event. If you’re looking for proof on that one, there are lot’s of sources (you don’t even need to dig really). All day long on that day they re-ran the same sequences (imprinting) and the same interviews from the same angles (remember a major city has many viewpoints).

We only have four still images from the pentagon, one of the most secure buildings in the world. In fact that has been the pattern for these types of “happenings,” low quality grainy images from only one view point and people being asked to “hand in” their footage for investigations that go nowhere, even now, with the quality of everyone’s camera.

We all know: https://twitter.com/rmthompson07/status/1172099449847463936

Three towers: https://twitter.com/DrutangAtHome/status/1171652481144766469

Same day: https://twitter.com/MemoryHold/status/1171897368964476929

NYFD: https://twitter.com/dontnwid/status/1172022723859615745

Dancing Israelis: https://twitter.com/MemoryHold/status/1171504832500264962

Gen. Wesley Clark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNt7s_Wed_4

This individual took a timely walk into a museum recently: https://twitter.com/VincentCrypt46

A few days ago Jeb Bush got some blowback on his “disgusting” tweet response: https://twitter.com/JebBush/status/1171955174065283072

Larry Silverstein: https://youtu.be/WXgpB-3xKKk  “Pull it”

Pre-programming:  https://gfycat.com/ru/advancedalarmingarrowana-fight-club-movies

“As the New York Times ‘ David W. Dunlap points out, Virgil’s “you” actually refers to the characters, Nisus and Euryalus, two warrior-lovers who “have just slaughtered the enemy in an orgy of violence, skewering soldiers whom [they] ambushed in their sleep.” And for this massacre, Nisus and Euryalus are killed, their heads impaled on spears. Of the inscription at the 9/11 Memorial Museum, Helen Morales, a classicist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, told the Times, “If we take into account its original context, the quotation is more applicable to the aggressors in the 9/11 tragedy than those honored by the memorial…So my first reaction is that the quotation is shockingly inappropriate for the U.S. victims of the 9/11 attack.” https://jezebel.com/quote-on-the-9-11-memorial-is-shockingly-inappropriate-1560975808

0 Comments

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

©2019 www.AD360.co   Go@AD360.co

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account