I got a little nod from Kevin Baker on my last post to not tie “satanism” to George Soros. I agree with him from the point of expediency. People don’t want to hear it. The force is weak in these ones.
I infer that his point is not that the two are not tied, Soros is, after all, the dictionary definition of “a bad neighbor.” Regular people can understand “George the sick f_k business guy,” but shy away from the more abstract ideas of psychic forces, evil and the temporal rewards of evildoing. A money grubbing swine, not someone whose focus is to wipe the Goyim from the planet, following tried and tested methods, following a plan.
Soros has the agenda of taking down national governments, fostering chaos. No problem there, people get that “just business angle,” though they don’t believe it.
I can connect luciferians, freemasons, mafias, three letter agencies, religion, banks and pedo-sadists together quite easily. They use similar tactics.
What would you like to call their aim? Power seeking…
What is power?
Power invokes control. What are the mechanisms of control? Shelter, water, food, trade items, health (Maslow and his heirarchy) What is a pyramid? Control of the many by a few.
How does one materially control all? Using a heirarchy. Heirarchy connotes “sacred ruler.” What is sacred?
If we follow the pyramid structure the root is matter (more materialist), while the higher realms are more spiritual, (less materialist). Why, then, is the objective of secular society to make us focus on “materialist” goals? Unless it’s a scam; “dumbing down.”
Let me drop some dots down…
(Tech) Larry Page wants to build an AI and control all information.
(Tech)23&Me wants to map the DNA of every person on the planet
(Tech)Bill Gates wants to “vaccinate”
(Tech)Cell Phones? Payment gateways, Bio Readers, Trackers, Location, Movement, Health sensors, W-Fi, dog collar
(Water of life) Polluted water?
(Shelter) Mass Immigration, Homelessness?
(Abuse of the innocent) Rampant pedo-satanism?
(War) Constant war?
(War) UN/EU army?
(War) Mass emigration?
(War) C_A control of world cocaine and cannabis supply?
(Pyramid) Mega global corporations?
(Pyramid) Supra nationals UN, EU, WTO, WB, IMF etc.?
(Pyramid) Bank bailouts?
(Civil society) Nuclear family = bad White man =bad Gun owner =bad Patriot =bad. Minorities =Good
(Sex, Genetics, Reproduction) Sexual deviancy applauded: gay, trans, gender pronouns, lots of porn, abortions to body parts sales, child sacrifice, blood drinking, genetic experiments, cloning, homeostasis experiments, sexualising kids, teaching weird shit to six year olds, drag queens in libraries, the finders, sex trafficking, slavery….and on, and on.
Secularism has taken God /good off of the top of the pyramid, replacing it with …enslavement? C’mon…? Go on…evil, what is evil?
(living the wrong way).
Let’s be libertines, hedonists, fatalists, nihilists, it’s all going up in flames anyway…who promotes this message? Why would they? Notably its the same people who sell you drugs, loans, the latest iPhone, etc. If you are so oblivious to evil that you simply can’t see it, you are doomed. That is the objective.
To return to my oft used phrase: the-greatest-trick-the-devil-ever-pulled-was-convincing-the-world-he-didn-t-exist
Did you read the Bill Barr quote. This is the highest law officer in the US…
Why would we (the greatest good for the greatest number) want to remove good (read sound process, leaders and policies) as a heirarchical model or structure? It does not make sense…unless it is “organized destruction.”
When @Kevin tells me to effectively avoid “religion,”he is making a case to address your ingrained stupidity: stick to the facts, avoid speculation.
You’ve put psy-ientists and technos at the head of a pyramid. They are scientism, not science, the idea is technocracy.
” This system explicitly contrasts with the notion that elected representatives should be the primary decision-makers in government,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy
Have you ever seen a TV economist get rich from following his own advice?
You know that DARPA invented the internet (war).
Why wouldn’t they control social media too?
I’ve told you that scientists work within a guild, heirarchy. They are pure “yes” men (or women). They get paid to give the “correct” answer (tech). If they don’t, they’re not great at roofing houses or mixing cement, so most pucker up.
I’ve met some good ones too, it doesn’t always have to be a long sentence ; )
Don’t scare the sheep, they want to be idiots (avoid responsibility).
I noted that @Phil used “religious” to insult me among the sycophants. It’s ok, those lickspittles would go for “bah, bah, black sheep” just as easily. Think of the use of the phrase, where it comes from, what is it’s payload.
He doubled down on this later (in another piece) by noting that he is not “religious;” meaning scientific, reasoned, rational, capable of “determining” fact from fiction. This is a useful tactic to use on fools…”would I lie to you? Of course you would.
In the “opinion”of a detractor, the social value is in besmriching my reputation and by extension the writing I produce. By imputing a “religious rationale (stupidity), my facts can be discarded.
Where is your proof, you filthy shill?
The same shill that ran cover for Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted pedo who died in mysterious circumstances (fact), connected to elite pedo rings worldwide, child trafficking and human experiments.
“…former senior executive for Israel’s Directorate of Military Intelligence, Ari Ben-Menashe, claimed not only to have met Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, back in the 1980s, but that both Epstein and Maxwell were already working with Israeli intelligence during that time period.
Is my (attributed) consequentialist “religiosity” somehow making this not a fact? By insulting the messenger the message becomes invalid, oops, no…how clever, how very ABC of you.
Why is the devil (do-evil) associated with tricksterism?
One of the simplest tricks is to be the one pointing fingers. The human mind is not good at deciphering “projection.”
Accusers say that the other is doing what they are doing. You’ll see it currently, live, in the “whistlebower hoax.”
This distinction between saying and doing is relevant. For do-gooders word is tied to action. Reputation precedes one. For the evil doer word is not corellated to action, accountability for words is a joke, unless you’re selling “hate speech” this week. Persona (mask) is distinct from person. Position is their reality. Watch Schiff at work. He is a masterclass in duplicity, fabrication and abuse of position, in full view of the entire world.
Why are religious festivals (in the west) now shopping days? Doesn’t that seem odd, those specific days?
What is shopping? Materialism marketed as a “religion.”
What is materialism?
Why has the doing of science become materialism?
What is scientism?
Scientists get paid thru grants, they don’t “do” science in the traditional sense, as in get paid via their innovations. They are paid to follow the party line. I addressed this topic before in regard to @princehector and his throne or”petard.”
I noted today that Tiffany Fitz took a similar line…although she left out the craven academic sl_ts abusing the minds of of gullible young people.
The occult? A screen
Note climate alarmists and their b_llshit science.
The same people hide the fact that Greta is a puppet. Even though she has no science at all, is ferried around the world by PR companies, becoming GQs man of the year and being “shortlisted” for a nobel prize, they don’t find that odd. A”little religious icon” sent by the gods of Public Relations just for them. They can’t even see the irony, the evangelical morons that they are.
They discard any science that disagrees with their nonsense, yet support this fakery.
Nothing but propagandists, wearing a cloak of science. They DO nothing. They talk you into their scam. The science they profess is a “projection”
The consensus they push is “political”
They love peer review.
They never show the documented proofs and pretend not to know the counter science.
They think the world is going to end. That is their religion. It’s not. It’s their “control” of “the narrative” (lie) that ends, if you tell them to f_ck off.
Doesn’t it sound suspicously like alchemy? Or a religion? Zealots? Cultists? Changing base metal (yours) to gold (theirs). Bitcoin anyone?
The key objective behind the cr_p talk is to claim taxes from national governments to keep their stupid supra national organisations running, thereby funding more b_llshit science, ad infinitum. This technique is called manifestation (or b_ullshit, if you like to keep it simple).
Why was Lloyd Blankein laughing at congress?
Because banks are a cartel, he was protected.
Why is the Epstein story not front page news?
Because pedos are a cartel, they are protected.
Why does hollywood, the media, deepstate and the Washington swamp hate Trump?
Because they are a cartel and were protected.
You claim there is no evil, because you’ve hidden the do-evils?
You are claiming there is no God, because you’ve hidden the Good?
In both cases it is a “claim.” Who are you? Where is your proof?
They profess to be “elite”…yet they are lower than a snake’s belly. They tell you; you are “nothing”- the reality is that you are each a seed of truth, born free, with infinite potential. It’s all lies, fakery and deception. You should intuitively know from whence that comes.
Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge. “Because you have rejected knowledge, I also reject you as my priests; because you have ignored the law of your God, I also will ignore your children.”
Never mistake a reader for a fool.
” We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” https://constitutioncenter.org/media/files/constitution.pdf
“We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security. ” https://www.constitutionfacts.com/content/declaration/files/Declaration_ReadTheDeclaration.pdf
At the close of the Constitutional Convention on September 17, 1787, as Benjamin Franklin left the hall in Philadelphia, he was asked, “What kind of government have you given us, Dr. Franklin?” He replied: “A republic, if you can keep it.”1 https://utahlinks.org/learn/docs/Bradley_Republic.pdf